|
22nd February 2002
Within the next few months a new war may be launched by America
against Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein by military force and
instal a puppet government taking orders from Washington to
look after their interests and gain control of the oil
Our TV news bulletins will be full of pictures of US planes
leaving the aircraft carriers and heading for Baghdad, foreign
correspondents in flak jackets with video phones will be seen
in front of burning buildings, the official spokesmen in the
White House will be reporting of the humanitarian nature of
the operation and intelligence briefings will be discreetly
handed over to distinguished media commentators and broadcasters
to "help them with their articles and programmes".
We may even be told that the International Community is
supporting it when we all know that opposition worldwide is
almost unanimous,
This is modern war as it is fought today by a superpower
and
there are women now alive with their families in Baghdad who
will be widows when the bombing starts, children who will
be orphans and those casualties will be dismissed as collateral
damage and their deaths will be ignored as have been the deaths
of nearly half-a-million killed by the sanctions imposed by
the West.
The strategy behind all this was set out very clearly by
the US Department of Defence published on May 30th 2000 which
explained what their policy is.
"Full Spectrum Dominance implies that US forces are
able to conduct prompt, sustained and synchronized operations
with combinations of forces tailored to specific situations
and with access to and freedom to operate in all domains -
space, sea, land, air and information.
"Additionally, given the global nature of our interests
and obligations, the United States must maintain its overseas
presence forces and the ability to rapidly project power world
wide to achieve full spectrum dominance."
In short the USA has decided to tear up the UN Charter,
scrap any international treaties it has signed, disregard
the rule of law and set out to dominate the world, which is
a threat to all of us and to peace itself.
What is being planned at this very moment in the White House
is a war of aggression, and a threat to world peace, and we,
in Britain, are expected to accept it and back the USA on
the grounds that we have a 'special relationship' with America
and that if the British government dared to criticize it publicly
the prime minister would lose all his influence with the President.
In fact Mr Blair has virtually no influence in Washington
and his real fear is that if he spoke out against the war
President Bush could remove our nuclear weapons, discontinue
the supply of warheads, cancel the technology links, switch
off the global satellite system needed to target them, thus
ending our pretence to be an independent nuclear power, which
we are not.
Britain obviously does not have the power to stop the USA
and neither does the European Union but we do have the power
to demand that if the US behaves unilaterally they cannot
rely on retaining their bases here or any political support
from us.
For all these reasons the Peace Movement in this country
must be ready for our biggest campaign ever and it should
have one specific objective: the withdrawal of all US bases
from Britain and a flat rejection of any co-operation with
the Star Wars project.
This is the message which, coming through telegrams from
American ambassadors all over the world back to the State
Department in Washington, just might make them stop and think
because however strong you are, being hated across the globe,
as they would be, would be an even bigger threat to their
interests.
The Bush policy of revenge bombing has been tried by Sharon,
has failed and a growing number of Israelis, including many
ex-officers, are now demanding a real peace solution that
recognises a Palestinian state and withdraws from the occupied
territories, which offers the only real hope of a lasting
peace.
We should however occasionally, remind ourselves of the
other America and what it stood for, as set out in a historic
statement recently republished.
"The way chosen by the United States was plainly marked
by a few clear precepts.... all humanity shares a common hunger
for peace and fellowship and justice.... no nation's security
can be lastingly achieved in isolation, but only in effective
cooperation with fellow nations...any nation's attempt to
dictate other nations their form of government is indefensible...
a nation's hope of lasting peace cannot be firmly based upon
any race in armaments but rather upon just relations and honest
understanding with all other nations.... faithful to the spirit
that inspired the United Nations... to control and to reduce
armaments... to allow all nations to devote their energies
to the tasks of healing the war's wounds, of clothing and
feeding and housing the needy, of perfecting a just political
life, of enjoying the fruits of their own free toil".
Those were not the words of some young left-wing idealist
but of General Dwight D Eisenhower, a Republican President
who was in the White House nearly fifty years ago, and who
knew from experience what war meant.
The American Peace movement now wants to link up with others
world wide and Eisenhower has given them a lead we can follow.
22/2/02
|