|
22nd March 2002
Europe must be more like the USA, under Bush, said the Prime
Minister at the Barcelona Summit working closely with Berlusconi
the most right wing Italian leader since Mussolini.
The trade union movement, whom he has implied are "wreckers"
will apparently be told that British membership of the Euro
will allow the Bankers to cut back on their rights in favour
of a more flexible system of production allowing workers to
be laid off without protection just as the Dockers were, years
ago, under the brutal system known as casual labour.
And if we must become more like the United States will we
also have to ditch the NHS, because the USA does not have
one and there are forty million Americans who have absolutely
no health care provision and that must help to keep taxation
low for the super-rich and make the workforce much more flexible
and obedient to their bosses for fear of losing their jobs.
Hearing this seems to suggest that the prime minister himself
has, in effect, now decided to leave the Labour party and
go off on his own without bothering even to consult his own
colleagues in the cabinet, parliament or the party and even
the argument that this might lose him votes may not influence
him for it is not entirely clear whether he himself actually
intends to fight another election personally, and if he does
not it would explain his lack of concern for what happens
next.
To alienate the Police, the Postal workers and the London
teachers at once, all of whom are immensely popular with the
public, is almost unintelligible and at the Central Hall last
Saturday when a huge rally of postal workers took place I
had a chance to talk to some of the teachers who had been
on strike and joked with the police outside by offering to
go on their picket line whenever they needed me, which seemed
to be very welcome to them.
I cannot, in my own life-time in politics recall a situation
anything like this and the movement has to consider very carefully
how it should respond, bearing in mind the fact that the public
look to us to defend the services on which they depend.
Everything we say and do must be thought out to retain that
public support because in the end it will be public opinion
that can be decisive and for this reason we have to learn
some lessons from the past, the most important being to avoid
personalities and stick to the issues for two very powerful
reasons.
This is not because we are a lot of goody-goodies but for
two very powerful reasons and they are these.
First because the public support that we need to stop the
war against Iraq, protect the public services, restore trade
union rights and promote our cause, critically depends on
us getting our arguments across in a clear and entirely positive
way that is reassuring, and not frightening, so that the media
cannot portray it as a bitter personal feud which it certainly
is not.
Secondly because we ought to know by now that getting rid
of a leading political figure very often fails to get rid
of the ideas for which that person stood, as we will remember
when the slogans were "Thatcher,Thatcher, Thatcher Out,
Out Out", which no doubt helped to get rid of her but
did not get rid of her ideas, many of which are alive and
well in New Labour.
And the chants, at the time of the Vietnam war, "Hey
Hey LBJ how many kids did you kill today" which no doubt
helped the American people to learn the hard lessons of that
war did not prevent them from electing a new president who
seems ready to launch wars against an even larger number of
nations, using Britain as one of its puppets.
This time we must take the initiative with a flood of ideas
coming from the Movement itself around which we can campaign
with conviction and knowledge designed to consolidate the
support we know we have.
It is a great mistake to think of politics only in terms
of polling day and candidates as if the ballot paper was our
only weapon - important as it is that we should use it to
see that we are represented effectively in the Commons and
Whitehall.
We have all too often been content to respond to what successive
governments have proposed, instead of taking the lead and
demanding what we want accompanied by the publication of well
thought out plans that would make them possible, based upon
the unique experience of those who are doing the job at the
working level.
The Rail Unions, for example, are by far the best qualified
to say exactly how the railways should be run dispensing with
the layer upon layer of strategic authorities and regulators,
advised by well-paid consultants who hover ineffectively over
companies that are only interested in their dividends.
Similarly teachers are by far the best people to develop
programmes that best advance all their pupils and know what
is wrong and how it can be put right far better than those
who are undermining comprehensive education or, like Chris
Woodhead used OFSTED to demoralize those who do the job.
The old Union of Post Office Workers - the UPW, now a part
of the CWU, was deeply committed to Guild Socialism or industrial
democracy and this is the moment when we should revive that
tradition to defeat the battery of advisers, bankers and business
men who are planning to dismantle the public services so as
to grab hold of the budgets they command and do so in the
name of modernization.
22/3/02
|